4.7 Article

Focused peptide library screening as a route to a superior affinity ligand for antibody purification

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-91208-0

关键词

-

资金

  1. Slovenian Research Agency [P4-0127]
  2. University of Ljubljana Innovation Fund [820-1/2020-33]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of a selective short linear peptide ligand of the IgG Fc region, capable of capturing all four IgG subclasses, was reported. This ligand was discovered through in vitro directed evolution and displayed high affinity for IgG, comparable to commercially employed protein A-based resin, after characterization and validation.
Affinity chromatography is the linchpin of antibody downstream processing and typically relies on bacterial immunoglobulin (Ig)-binding proteins, epitomized by staphylococcal protein A-based ligands. However, such affinity ligands are fairly costly and suffer from chemical instability, leading to ligand denaturation and leaching from chromatographic support. Innovations in this area are aimed at developing robust and highly selective antibody ligands capable of withstanding harsh column sanitization conditions. We report the development and first-stage characterization of a selective short linear peptide ligand of the IgG Fc region capable of capturing all four IgG subclasses. The ligand was discovered through in vitro directed evolution. A focused phage-display library based on a previously identified peptide lead was subjected to a single-round screen against a pool of human IgG. The hits were identified with next-generation sequencing and ranked according to the enrichment ratio relative to their frequency in the pre-screened library. The top enriched peptide GSYWYNVWF displaying highest affinity for IgG was coupled to bromohydrin-activated agarose beads via a branched linker. The resulting affinity matrix was characterized with a dynamic binding capacity of approx. 43 mg/mL, on par with commercially employed protein A-based resin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据