4.7 Article

De novo deoxyribonucleotide biosynthesis regulates cell growth and tumor progression in small-cell lung carcinoma

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-92948-9

关键词

-

资金

  1. Yamagata prefectural government
  2. City of Tsuruoka
  3. National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund [31-A-6]
  4. JSPS KAKENHI [17K07189, 20K07627]
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17K07189, 20K07627] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates that RRM1 is essential for the growth of small-cell lung carcinoma cells, with its deletion inducing DNA damage response and reducing the number of cells in S phase cell cycle arrest. Additionally, RRM1 deletion causes overall changes in the metabolic profile of SCLC cells, revealing a potential link between tumor growth and the regulation of deoxyribonucleotide metabolism in SCLC.
Deoxyribonucleotide biosynthesis from ribonucleotides supports the growth of active cancer cells by producing building blocks for DNA. Although ribonucleotide reductase (RNR) is known to catalyze the rate-limiting step of de novo deoxyribonucleotide triphosphate (dNTP) synthesis, the biological function of the RNR large subunit (RRM1) in small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) remains unclear. In this study, we established siRNA-transfected SCLC cell lines to investigate the anticancer effect of silencing RRM1 gene expression. We found that RRM1 is required for the full growth of SCLC cells both in vitro and in vivo. In particular, the deletion of RRM1 induced a DNA damage response in SCLC cells and decreased the number of cells with S phase cell cycle arrest. We also elucidated the overall changes in the metabolic profile of SCLC cells caused by RRM1 deletion. Together, our findings reveal a relationship between the deoxyribonucleotide biosynthesis axis and key metabolic changes in SCLC, which may indicate a possible link between tumor growth and the regulation of deoxyribonucleotide metabolism in SCLC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据