4.7 Article

Exploring the links between volcano flank collapse and the magmatic evolution of an ocean island volcano: Fogo, Cape Verde

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-96897-1

关键词

-

资金

  1. French Government Laboratory of Excellence initiative [ANR-10LABX-0006]
  2. Region Auvergne
  3. European Regional Development Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study analyzes the chemical composition and age-controlled stratigraphy of lavas from Fogo volcano before and after a major flank collapse to track time variations and links between lithospheric, crustal, and surface processes. The findings reveal variations in magma differentiation, storage reorganization, and lithospheric assimilation following the collapse.
Mass-wasting of ocean island volcanoes is a well-documented phenomenon. Massive flank collapses may imply tens to hundreds of km(3) and generate mega-tsunamis. However, the causal links between this large-scale, low-frequency instability, and the time-space evolution of magma storage, crystal fractionation/accumulation, lithospheric assimilation, and partial melting remains unclear. This paper aims at tracking time variations and links between lithospheric, crustal and surface processes before and after a major flank collapse (Monte Amarelo collapse ca. 70 ka) of Fogo volcano, Cape Verde Islands, by analysing the chemical composition (major, trace elements, and Sr-Nd-Pb isotopes) and age-controlled stratigraphy (K-Ar and Ar-Ar dating) of lavas along vertical sections (Bordeira caldera walls). The high-resolution sampling allows detecting original variations of composition at different time-scales: (1) a 60 kyrs-long period of increase of magma differentiation before the collapse; (2) a 10 kyrs-long episode of reorganization of magma storage and evacuation of residual magmas (enriched in incompatible elements) after the collapse; and (3) a delayed impact at the lithospheric scale similar to 50 kyrs after the collapse (increasing EM1-like materiel assimilation).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据