4.7 Article

Enhanced cellular engraftment of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell spheroids by using nanosheets as scaffolds

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-93642-6

关键词

-

资金

  1. Special Research Grant on Defense Medicine
  2. JSPS KAKENHI [17K20116, 18H03539, 18H05469, 18K09501]
  3. Leading Initiative for Excellent Young Researchers (LEADER) by MEXT, Japan
  4. Noguchi Institute
  5. Tanaka Memorial Foundation
  6. Terumo Foundation for Life Sciences and Arts
  7. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17K20116, 18H03539, 18K09501] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Transplanting ASC spheroids onto skin wounds can prolong cell survival time and facilitate the healing of refractory ulcers. Using a nanosheet as a carrier, ASC spheroids survived for 14 days and significantly reduced the ulcer size. This method shows potential for cell therapy in treating various challenging skin wounds.
The short survival time of transplanted adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ASCs) is a problem for skin wound healing. Transplantation after the formation of cellular spheroids has been investigated as a promising method for prolonging cellular survival. However, there have been technical restrictions for transplantation of spheroids in clinical practice. Here, we show an effective method for transplantation of ASC spheroids onto skin wounds in order to efficiently cure refractory ulcers. To assist anchoring of spheroids onto skin wounds, we used a 120-nm-thick free-standing film (nanosheet) that has a highly adhesive property. Bioluminescence imaging showed that ASC spheroids carried by the nanosheet survived for 14 days, which is about two-times longer than that previously reported. Wounds treated with a nanosheet carrying ASC spheroids were 4-times smaller than untreated wounds on day 14. This method for transplantation of spheroids could be applied to cell therapy for various refractory skin wounds.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据