4.7 Article

GREB1L overexpression correlates with prognosis and immune cell infiltration in lung adenocarcinoma

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-92695-x

关键词

-

资金

  1. Wu Jieping Foundation [320.6750.19053]
  2. Innovation of Science and Technology, Fujian Province [2018Y9111]
  3. Financial Foundation of Fujian Province [(2020)729]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

GREB1L expression is significantly increased in LUAD and correlated with poor prognosis. High GREB1L expression is associated with enrichment in cell cycle, immune regulation, and methylation, making it a potential molecular marker for LUAD.
GREB1L is a protein-coding gene that is an important paralog of GREB1. However, its effects in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) have not been determined. Thus, we evaluated the prognostic value of GREB1L in LUAD using bioinformatics approaches. In particular, we evaluated the relationship between GREB1L and LUAD using a wide range of databases and analysis tools, including TCGA, GEO, HPA, TIMER, cBioPortal, and MethSurv. Compared with its expression in normal lung tissues, GREB1L expression was significantly increased in LUAD tissues. A univariate Cox analysis showed that high GREB1L expression levels were correlated with a poor OS in LUAD. Additionally, GREB1L expression was independently associated with OS through a multivariate Cox analysis. GSEA analysis revealed enrichment in cell cycle, immune regulation, and methylation. Moreover, high GREB1L expression was associated with poor survival. We also found that the methylation and genetic alteration level was associated with prognosis in patients with LUAD. Finally, an analysis of immune infiltration showed that GREB1L is correlated with immune cell infiltration, PD-1, and PD-L1. In summary, these results indicate that GREB1L is a potential molecular marker for poor prognosis in LUAD and provide additional insight for the development of therapies and prognostic markers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据