4.7 Article

Improvement in aqueous solubility of achiral symmetric cyclofenil by modification to a chiral asymmetric analog

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-92028-y

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Platform for Drug Discovery, Informatics, and Structural Life Science
  3. Tokyo Biochemical Research Foundation (KAKENHI) [17H06173, 18H02551, 25293027]
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18H02551, 25293027] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Converting the symmetrical molecular structure of drug candidates into asymmetrical form enhances aqueous solubility, even with increased hydrophobicity. This strategy can improve membrane permeability and biological activity.
Decreasing the partition coefficient (LogP) by the introduction of a hydrophilic group is the conventional approach for improving the aqueous solubility of drug candidates, but is not always effective. Since melting point is related to aqueous solubility, we and other groups have developed alternative strategies to improve solubility by means of chemical modification to weaken intermolecular interaction in the solid state, thereby lowering the melting point and increasing the solubility. Here, we show that converting the symmetrical molecular structure of the clinically used estrogen receptor (ER) antagonist cyclofenil (1) into asymmetrical form by introducing an alkyl group enhances the aqueous solubility. Among the synthesized analogs, the chiral methylated analog (R)-4c shows the highest solubility, being 3.6-fold more soluble than 1 even though its hydrophobicity is increased by the methylation. Furthermore, (R)-4c also showed higher membrane permeability than 1, while retaining a comparable metabolic rate, and equivalent biological activity of the active forms (R)-13a to 2. Further validation of this strategy using lead compounds having symmetric structures is expected.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据