4.7 Article

The Diet Quality and Nutrition Inadequacy of Pre-Frail Older Adults in New Zealand

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 13, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu13072384

关键词

frailty; macronutrients; micronutrients; aged; diet quality

资金

  1. AgeingWell Challenge, Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment (UoA) [3710944, 13538]
  2. Health Research Council New Zealand [3715401, HRC 14/604]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that the diet quality of pre-frail older adults was high in variety and adequacy but poor in moderation and balance. There were mineral inadequacies present, highlighting the need for targeted dietary interventions to improve frailty in older adults.
This study aimed to describe the diet quality of pre-frail community-dwelling older adults to extend the evidence of nutrition in frailty prevention. Pre-frailty, the transition state between a robust state and frailty, was ascertained using the FRAIL scale. Socio-demographic, health status, and 24-h dietary recalls were collected from 465 community-dwelling adults aged 75+ (60 years for Maori and Pacific people) across New Zealand. Diet quality was ascertained with the Diet Quality Index-International (DQI-I). Participants (median (IQR) age 80 (77-84), 59% female) had a moderately healthful diet, DQI-I score: 60.3 (54.0-64.7). Women scored slightly higher than men (p = 0.042). DQI-I components identified better dietary variety in men (p = 0.044), and dietary moderation in women (p = 0.002); both sexes performed equally well in dietary adequacy and poorly in dietary balance scores (73% and 47% of maximum scores, respectively). Low energy 20.3 (15.4-25.3) kcal/kg body weight (BW) and protein intakes 0.8 (0.6-1.0) g/kg BW were coupled with a high prevalence of mineral inadequacies: calcium (86%), magnesium (68%), selenium (79%), and zinc (men 82%). In conclusion, the diet quality of pre-frail older adults was moderately high in variety and adequacy but poor in moderation and balance. Our findings support targeted dietary interventions to ameliorate frailty.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据