4.7 Article

Are the Eatwell Guide and Nutrient Profiling Models Consistent in the UK?

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 13, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu13082732

关键词

nutrient profiling model; food-based dietary guidelines; food policy; diet

资金

  1. National Institute for Health Research, UK
  2. Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford
  3. NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre
  4. BHF [FS/15/34/31656]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found good agreement between the 2005 and 2018 versions of the NPM and the EWG in assessing the healthiness of diets in the UK population.
A nutrient profiling model (NPM) was developed in 2005 in the UK to regulate the marketing of foods to children. It was revised in 2018, but the new version has not been finalised. The Eatwell Guide (EWG) is the UK's official food-based dietary guidelines. The aim of this study was to evaluate the agreement between the 2005 and 2018 versions of the NPM and the EWG. Using recent National Diet and Nutrition Surveys, we estimated the healthiness of individual diets based on an EWG dietary score and a NPM dietary index. We then compared the percentage of agreement and Cohen's kappa for each combination of the EWG score and NPM index across the range of observed values for the 2005 and 2018 versions. A total of 3028 individual diets were assessed. Individuals with a higher (i.e., healthier) EWG score consumed a diet with, on average, a lower (i.e., healthier) NPM index both for the 2005 and 2018 versions. Overall, there was good agreement between the EWG score and the NPM dietary index at assessing the healthiness of representative diets of the UK population, when a low cut-off for the NPM dietary index was used, irrespective of the version. This suggests that dietary advice to the public is broadly aligned with NPM-based food policies and vice-versa.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据