4.7 Review

Nutrition in Menopausal Women: A Narrative Review

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 13, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu13072149

关键词

menopause; nutrition; body composition; bone; cardiovascular risk

资金

  1. Brazilian National Institute of Hormones and Women's Health/Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico [CNPq INCT 465482/2014-7]
  2. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Rio Grande do Sul [FAPERGS INCT 17/2551-0000519-8]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nutritional habits are crucial for postmenopausal women's health, with low-fat, plant-based diets showing beneficial effects on body composition. The Mediterranean diet pattern and other healthy habits may contribute to the prevention of bone, metabolic, and cardiovascular diseases during the postmenopausal period.
Among the various aspects of health promotion and lifestyle adaptation to the postmenopausal period, nutritional habits are essential because they concern all women, can be modified, and impact both longevity and quality of life. In this narrative review, we discuss the current evidence on the association between dietary patterns and clinical endpoints in postmenopausal women, such as body composition, bone mass, and risk markers for cardiovascular disease. Current evidence suggests that low-fat, plant-based diets are associated with beneficial effects on body composition, but further studies are needed to confirm these results in postmenopausal women. The Mediterranean diet pattern along with other healthy habits may help the primary prevention of bone, metabolic, and cardiovascular diseases in the postmenopausal period. It consists on the use of healthy foods that have anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties, and is associated with a small but significant decrease in blood pressure, reduction of fat mass, and improvement in cholesterol levels. These effects remain to be evaluated over a longer period of time, with the assessment of hard outcomes such as bone fractures, diabetes, and coronary ischemia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据