4.7 Article

Mediterranean Diet Adherence in a Sample of Italian Adolescents Attending Secondary School-The #facciamoComunicAzione Project

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 13, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu13082806

关键词

Mediterranean diet; adherence; Medi-Lite; students

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that adherence to the Mediterranean diet was generally low among secondary school students, especially in terms of consumption of meat and meat products, vegetables, legumes, dairy products, and fish. There were significant differences between girls and boys in the consumption of fruits, grains, meat, and dairy products.
Our aim was to assess adherence to the Mediterranean diet in a group of 726 secondary school students (336 girls, 390 boys) who completed the web-based Medi-Lite questionnaire simultaneously, during school hours, at the Istituto Professionale per l'Enogastronomia e l'Ospitalita Alberghiera Marco Polo in Genoa, Italy. The mean adherence score was 9.28 +/- 2.29, with significantly (p = 0.017) higher values in girls (9.5 +/- 2.2) than boys (9.1 +/- 2.4). As to the individual food components of the Medi-Lite score, 84% of students reported non-optimal consumption (i.e., the choice that yielded <= 1 point) of meat and meat products, and over 50% reported non-optimal consumption of vegetables, legumes, dairy products, and fish. Significant differences between girls and boys were observed for fruit (p = 0.003), cereals (p < 0.001), meat and meat products (p < 0.001), and dairy products (p = 0.003). By conducting a principal component analysis, we observed that Medi-Lite items on the consumption of some animal products (meat and meat products and dairy products) and some plant products (fruit, vegetables, and legumes) generated contrasting patterns of responses, denoting excessive consumption in the first case and underconsumption in the second. This result suggests the need for effective actions to promote healthy eating habits in young people.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据