4.7 Review

Fruit Juices: Are They Helpful or Harmful? An Evidence Review

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 13, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu13061815

关键词

fruit juice; cardiovascular; type 2 diabetes; obesity; nutrient density; cognitive function; polyphenols; potassium

资金

  1. Fruit Juice Science Centre

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Moderate consumption of 100% fruit juice (75-224 mL daily) does not increase the risk of obesity, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, or poor glycaemic control, but instead benefits vascular function and lowers blood pressure. Observational studies suggest a link between fruit juice consumption, nutrient adequacy, and reduced risk of stroke.
Dietary guidelines often deal with 100% fruit juice (FJ) inconsistently because it represents a source of free sugars. However, FJ also provides bioavailable micronutrients and plant bioactives at levels similar to those found in whole fruits. The present review weighs up the evidence from high-quality studies investigating a potential health harm for FJ against evidence from studies which indicate a potential health benefit. The findings reveal that FJ consumption, at moderate intakes consistent with the dietary guidelines for the US and some European countries (75-224 mL daily), does not increase the risk of obesity, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease or poor glycaemic control. In contrast, regular consumption of FJ-even up to 500 mL per day in short-to-medium-term studies-appears to confer a health benefit in terms of vascular function and reduced blood pressure. Emerging evidence for cognitive health benefits requires further investigation in human trials. Observational studies report associations between FJ and nutrient adequacy and suggest that FJ consumption is associated with reduced risk of stroke. In conclusion, FJ appears to offer more benefit than risk and there appears to be no justification for discouraging FJ within a balanced diet for children and adults.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据