期刊
NUTRIENTS
卷 13, 期 9, 页码 -出版社
MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu13093192
关键词
NAFLD; probiotics; gut microbiota; mucosal immune function; intestinal permeability
资金
- Fundamental Research Grant Scheme of the Ministry of Higher Education [FRGS/1/2018/SKK02/UKM/03/2]
- Young Lecturers' Incentive Grant (GGPM) of the National University of Malaysia [GGPM-2019-036]
- B-Crobes Laboratory Sdn
The use of probiotics did not lead to significant clinical improvement in NAFLD patients in terms of hepatic steatosis and fibrosis levels, but at the microenvironment level, probiotics seemed to stabilize mucosal immune function and protect patients against increased intestinal permeability. Further studies with larger sample sizes and different probiotic strains are needed to evaluate the true benefit of probiotics in NAFLD.
Treatment for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) currently consists of lifestyle modifications such as a low-fat diet, weight loss, and exercise. The gut microbiota forms part of the gut-liver axis and serves as a potential target for NAFLD treatment. We investigated the effect of probiotics on hepatic steatosis, fibrosis, and biochemical blood tests in patients with NAFLD. At the small intestinal mucosal level, we examined the effect of probiotics on the expression of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes, as well as the tight junction protein zona occluden-1 (ZO-1). This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involving ultrasound-diagnosed NAFLD patients (n = 39) who were supplemented with either a probiotics sachet (MCP(R) BCMC(R) strains) or a placebo for a total of 6 months. Multi-strain probiotics (MCP(R) BCMC(R) strains) containing six different Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium species at a concentration of 30 billion CFU were used. There were no significant changes at the end of the study in terms of hepatic steatosis (probiotics: -21.70 +/- 42.6 dB/m, p = 0.052 vs. placebo: -10.72 +/- 46.6 dB/m, p = 0.29) and fibrosis levels (probiotics: -0.25 +/- 1.77 kPa, p = 0.55 vs. placebo: -0.62 +/- 2.37 kPa, p = 0.23) as measured by transient elastography. Likewise, no significant changes were found for both groups for the following parameters: LiverFAST analysis (steatosis, fibrosis and inflammation scores), alanine aminotransferase, total cholesterol, triglycerides, and fasting glucose. In the immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis, no significant expression changes were seen for CD4+ T lymphocytes in either group (probiotics: -0.33 +/- 1.67, p = 0.35 vs. placebo: 0.35 +/- 3.25, p = 0.63). However, significant reductions in the expression of CD8+ T lymphocytes (-7.0 +/- 13.73, p = 0.04) and ZO-1 (Z-score = -2.86, p = 0.04) were found in the placebo group, but no significant changes in the probiotics group. In this pilot study, the use of probiotics did not result in any significant clinical improvement in NAFLD patients. However, at the microenvironment level (i.e., the small intestinal mucosa), probiotics seemed to be able to stabilize the mucosal immune function and to protect NAFLD patients against increased intestinal permeability. Therefore, probiotics might have a complementary role in treating NAFLD. Further studies with larger sample sizes, a longer duration, and different probiotic strains are needed to evaluate the real benefit of probiotics in NAFLD.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据