4.7 Article

A Higher Intake of Energy at Dinner Is Associated with Incident Metabolic Syndrome: A Prospective Cohort Study in Older Adults

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 13, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu13093035

关键词

metabolic syndrome; chronobiology; timing of food; older adults; intake of energy; food intake; dinner intake; eating occasions

资金

  1. Instituto Carlos III, State Secretary of R+D+I
  2. FEDER/FSE [17/1709, 19/319, 19/665, 20/00144]
  3. CIBERESP
  4. Instituto de Salud Carlos III

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research has shown that higher energy intake at dinner is associated with an increased risk of metabolic syndrome in older adults, while reducing energy intake at dinner may be a simple strategy to prevent MetS.
A higher energy intake (EI) at night has been associated with a higher risk of obesity, while a higher EI at lunch may protect against weight gain. This study examined the association between EI throughout the day and incident metabolic syndrome (MetS) among older adults. A cohort of 607 individuals aged >= 60 free from MetS at baseline was followed from 2008-2010 until 2015. At baseline, habitual EI was assessed on six eating occasions: breakfast, mid-morning snack, lunch, afternoon snack, dinner, and snacking. MetS was defined according to the harmonized definition. Statistical analyses were performed with logistic regression and adjusted for the main confounders, including total EI, diet quality, and physical activity/sedentary behavior. During follow-up, 101 new MetS cases occurred. Compared to the lowest sex-specific quartile of EI at dinner, the OR (95% confidence interval) for incident MetS were: 1.71 (0.85-3.46) in the second, 1.70 (0.81-3.54) in the third, and 2.57 (1.14-5.79) in the fourth quartile (p-trend: 0.034). Elevated waist circumference and triglycerides were the MetS components that most contributed to this association. A higher EI at dinner was associated with a higher risk of MetS in older adults. Reducing EI at dinner might be a simple strategy to prevent MetS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据