4.7 Article

Risk Factors for Eating Disorders and Perception of Body in Young Adults Associated with Sex

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 13, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu13082819

关键词

food; eating habits; consumption; sex; binge eating; anorexia nervosa; compulsive overeating; eating disorders

资金

  1. [010/RID/2018/19]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to examine the differences in food choices and eating behavior between males and females. It found that females were at higher risk for developing eating disorders and showed more unhealthy eating habits, while males had a higher frequency of eating meat and drinking alcohol.
(1) Background: The integrated approach to the prevention and treatment of eating disorders (EDs) requires knowledge and can be used only when specific risk factors are known. The aim of this study was to examine the differences in food choices and eating behavior between males and females; (2) Methods: This study comprised 148 females and 27 males aged from 18 to 26-years-old (MEAN +/- SD = 21.4 +/- 1.86 years old). Information about EDs was obtained from four different measures: the body mass index (BMI), the eating disorder screen for primary care (ESP), a standardized and validated questionnaire called My Eating Habits and the food frequency questionnaire with 10 answers (FFQ-10); (3) Results: The risk for developing eating disorders was detected in nearly 67% of respondents. It was also shown that EDs were more common in females and how body weight affected the way individuals feel about themselves. Females showed more unhealthy eating habits, which contributed to dietary restrictions and emotional overeating, as they were also afraid of gaining weight. The frequency of eating meat and drinking alcohol was higher in males, whereas eating legume seeds was less frequent in females. (4) Conclusions: This study opens a new field, which will help health care professionals recognize the problems with eating disorders and treat them based on different sex characteristics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据