4.7 Review

Lutein Has a Positive Impact on Brain Health in Healthy Older Adults: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 13, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu13061746

关键词

lutein; carotenoid; brain; MRI; VBM; systematic review

资金

  1. Lion Corporation
  2. JSPS KAKENHI [16KT0002, 19H01760, 19H05003]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19H01760, 16KT0002, 19H05003] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Through a systematic review of nine studies utilizing various imaging techniques, it was found that lutein intake can have beneficial effects on the cognitive function and brain health of older adults.
A previous systematic review revealed that lutein intake leads to improved cognitive function among older adults. However, the association between lutein intake and brain health remains unclear. Methods: We searched the Web of Science, PubMed, PsycInfo, and Cochrane Library for research papers. The criteria were (1) an intervention study using oral lutein intake or a cross-sectional study that examined lutein levels and the brain, (2) participants were older adults, and (3) brain activities or structures were measured using a brain imaging technique (magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or electroencephalography (EEG)). Results: Seven studies using MRI (brain activities during rest, cognitive tasks, and brain structure) and two studies using EEG were included. We mainly focused on MRI studies. Three intervention studies using MRI indicated that 10 mg lutein intake over 12 months had a positive impact on healthy older adults' brain activities during learning, resting-state connectivity, and gray matter volumes. Four cross-sectional studies using MRI suggested that lutein was positively associated with brain structure and neural efficiency during cognitive tasks. Conclusion: Although only nine studies that used similar datasets were reviewed, this systematic review indicates that lutein has beneficial effects on healthy older adults' brain health.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据