4.7 Article

A Case-Series Observation of Sweat Rate Variability in Endurance-Trained Athletes

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 13, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu13061807

关键词

hypohydration; hyperhydration; hyponatremia; fluid loss; fluid balance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Proper hydration during exercise is crucial for athletes, but sweat rate can vary significantly day-to-day and in different temperature conditions. This study found that there were significant differences in sweat rate variability between different temperature ranges, and a single assessment may not accurately represent an individual's typical sweat rate even in similar environmental conditions.
Adequate fluid replacement during exercise is an important consideration for athletes, however sweat rate (SR) can vary day-to-day. The purpose of this study was to investigate day-to-day variations in SR while performing self-selected exercise sessions to evaluate error in SR estimations in similar temperature conditions. Thirteen endurance-trained athletes completed training sessions in a case-series design 1x/week for a minimum 30 min of running/biking over 24 weeks. Body mass was recorded pre/post-training and corrected for fluid consumption. Data were split into three Wet-Bulb Globe Thermometer (WBGT) conditions: LOW (<10 degrees C), MOD (10-19.9 degrees C), HIGH (>20 degrees C). No significant differences existed in exercise duration, distance, pace, or WBGT for any group (p > 0.07). Significant differences in SR variability occurred for all groups, with average differences of: LOW = 0.15 L/h; MOD = 0.14 L/h; HIGH = 0.16 L/h (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in mean SR between LOW-MOD (p > 0.9), but significant differences between LOW-HIGH and MOD-HIGH (p < 0.03). The assessment of SR can provide useful data for determining hydration strategies. The significant differences in SR within each temperature range indicates a single assessment may not accurately represent an individual's typical SR even in similar environmental conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据