4.7 Review

Histamine Intolerance-The More We Know the Less We Know. A Review

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 13, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu13072228

关键词

histamine intolerance; histamine; diamine oxidase; DAO; low-histamine diet; probiotics; food intolerance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Food intake can trigger adverse reactions, with food intolerance being an abnormal non-immunological response to ingested food or its components. Histamine intolerance is a type of food intolerance that is difficult to diagnose and requires a complex approach for treatment, including low-histamine diet and DAO supplementation.
The intake of food may be an initiator of adverse reactions. Food intolerance is an abnormal non-immunological response of the organism to the ingestion of food or its components in a dosage normally tolerated. Despite the fact that food intolerance is spread throughout the world, its diagnosing is still difficult. Histamine intolerance (HIT) is the term for that type of food intolerance which includes a set of undesirable reactions as a result of accumulated or ingested histamine. Manifestations may be caused by various pathophysiological mechanisms or a combination of them. The problem with a diagnosis of HIT is precisely the inconstancy and variety of the manifestations in the same individual following similar stimuli. The diagnosing of HIT therefore requires a complex time-demanding multidisciplinary approach, including the systematic elimination of disorders with a similar manifestation of symptoms. Among therapeutic approaches, the gold standard is a low-histamine diet. A good response to such a diet is considered to be confirmation of HIT. Alongside the dietary measures, DAO supplementation supporting the degradation of ingested histamine may be considered as subsidiary treatment for individuals with intestinal DAO deficiency. If antihistamines are indicated, the treatment should be conscious and time-limited, while 2nd or 3rd generation of H-1 antihistamines should take precedence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据