4.6 Review

Evolving Models and Tools for Microglial Studies in the Central Nervous System

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE BULLETIN
卷 37, 期 8, 页码 1218-1233

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12264-021-00706-8

关键词

Microglial cell lines; Primary microglia; Induced microglia-like cells; Transgenic mice; Human-mouse chimeric models; Microglial replacement; Single-cell technology; In vivo imaging

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFC0909200]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81671336]
  3. Shanghai Key Laboratory of Psychotic Disorders [YG2016ZD06]
  4. Shanghai Mental Health Center [2019-YJ06]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The key factors in the study of microglia are the choice of appropriate research models and associated tools, with mice being the most commonly used animal model. This review also summarizes the types of mouse and human-derived microglial research models, as well as recent developments in novel single-cell and in vivo imaging technologies.
Microglia play multiple roles in such processes as brain development, homeostasis, and pathology. Due to their diverse mechanisms of functions, the complex sub-classifications, and the large differences between different species, especially compared with humans, very different or even opposite conclusions can be drawn from studies with different research models. The choice of appropriate research models and the associated tools are thus key ingredients of studies on microglia. Mice are the most commonly used animal models. In this review, we summarize in vitro and in vivo models of mouse and human-derived microglial research models, including microglial cell lines, primary microglia, induced microglia-like cells, transgenic mice, human-mouse chimeric models, and microglial replacement models. We also summarize recent developments in novel single-cell and in vivo imaging technologies. We hope our review can serve as an efficient reference for the future study of microglia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据