4.8 Article

Observation-based early-warning signals for a collapse of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation

期刊

NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE
卷 11, 期 8, 页码 680-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41558-021-01097-4

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) has gradually weakened in recent decades, potentially approaching a critical transition point that could have significant impacts on the global climate system. This study introduces an observation-based early-warning system for such transitions, highlighting the importance of monitoring the AMOC for potential changes in its operation mode.
The Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC), a major ocean current system transporting warm surface waters toward the northern Atlantic, has been suggested to exhibit two distinct modes of operation. A collapse from the currently attained strong to the weak mode would have severe impacts on the global climate system and further multi-stable Earth system components. Observations and recently suggested fingerprints of AMOC variability indicate a gradual weakening during the last decades, but estimates of the critical transition point remain uncertain. Here, a robust and general early-warning indicator for forthcoming critical transitions is introduced. Significant early-warning signals are found in eight independent AMOC indices, based on observational sea-surface temperature and salinity data from across the Atlantic Ocean basin. These results reveal spatially consistent empirical evidence that, in the course of the last century, the AMOC may have evolved from relatively stable conditions to a point close to a critical transition. The Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) is currently strong, but transition to its weak mode could see significant changes in the climate system. This work presents an observation-based early-warning system for such transitions and shows that the AMOC may be approaching a transition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据