4.6 Article

Effects of Different Chenopodium formosanum Parts on Antioxidant Capacity and Optimal Extraction Analysis by Taguchi Method

期刊

MATERIALS
卷 14, 期 16, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma14164679

关键词

antioxidant; Chenopodium formosanum; leaf; extract; design of experiment; Taguchi method

资金

  1. National United University
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan [MOST 108-2218-E-239-003, MOST 110-2622-E-239-003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chenopodium formosanum (CF), a native plant in Taiwan, is rich in nutrients and antioxidants. The seeds and leaves have higher radical scavenging ability than stems and roots, making them suitable as a source of antioxidants and aiding in waste reduction.
Chenopodium formosanum (CF), rich in nutrients and antioxidants, is a native plant in Taiwan. During the harvest, the seeds are collected, while the roots, stems, and leaves remain on the field as agricultural waste. In this study, di(phenyl)-(2,4,6-trinitrophenyl)iminoazanium (DPPH) radical scavenging ability and 2,2 '-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) radical scavenging ability experiments of seeds, leaves, stems, and roots were designed using the Taguchi method (TM) under three conditions: Ethanol concentration (0-100%), temperature (25-65 degrees C), and extraction time (30-150 min). The result demonstrates that seeds and leaves have higher radical scavenging ability than stems and roots. Many studies focused on CF seeds. Therefore, this study selected CF leaves and optimized DPPH, ABTS, total phenol content (TPC), total flavonoid content (TFC), and reducing power (RP) through TM, showing that the predicted value of the leaf is close to the actual value. The optimized results of CF leaves were DPPH 85.22%, ABTS 46.51%, TPC 116.54 mu g GAE/mL, TFC 143.46 mu g QE/mL, and RP 23.29 mu g VCE (vitamin C equivalent)/mL. The DPPH and ABTS of CF leaves were second only to the results of CF seeds. It can be seen that CF leaves have the potential as a source of antioxidants and help in waste reduction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据