4.6 Article

Ventilation Prediction for an Industrial Cement Raw Ball Mill by BNN-A Conscious Lab Approach

期刊

MATERIALS
卷 14, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma14123220

关键词

cement; ball mill; conscious laboratory; random forest; support vector regression

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ventilation is crucial for maintaining temperature and material transportation in cement mills. A study using a concept called conscious laboratory (CL) and a boosted neural network (BNN) found that mill outlet pressure and separator fan ampere were the most important variables for predicting ventilation in an industrial cement ball mill. BNN was also shown to accurately model ventilation factors based on operational variables with a low error rate.
In cement mills, ventilation is a critical key for maintaining temperature and material transportation. However, relationships between operational variables and ventilation factors for an industrial cement ball mill were not addressed until today. This investigation is going to fill this gap based on a newly developed concept named conscious laboratory (CL). For constructing the CL, a boosted neural network (BNN), as a recently developed comprehensive artificial intelligence model, was applied through over 35 different variables, with more than 2000 records monitored for an industrial cement ball mill. BNN could assess multivariable nonlinear relationships among this vast dataset, and indicated mill outlet pressure and the ampere of the separator fan had the highest rank for the ventilation prediction. BNN could accurately model ventilation factors based on the operational variables with a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.6. BNN showed a lower error than other traditional machine learning models (RMSE: random forest 0.71, support vector regression: 0.76). Since improving the milling efficiency has an essential role in machine development and energy utilization, these results can open a new window to the optimal designing of comminution units for the material technologies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据