4.6 Article

Comparison of the Toxicity of Pristine Graphene and Graphene Oxide, Using Four Biological Models

期刊

MATERIALS
卷 14, 期 15, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma14154250

关键词

graphene; graphene oxide; toxicity; biological models

资金

  1. National Science Center in Poland [2016/23/D/NZ9/01401, 2015/19/D/NZ8/03871]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Graphene has various applications in biomedicine, with delivery systems, sensors, tissue engineering, and biological agents being the main areas. Toxicity analysis of pristine graphene (PG) and graphene oxide (GO) on different biological models showed higher toxicity at higher doses. The differences in toxicity between the forms of graphene are due to their physicochemical properties and the specific biological model used for testing.
There are numerous applications of graphene in biomedicine and they can be classified into several main areas: delivery systems, sensors, tissue engineering and biological agents. The growing biomedical field of applications of graphene and its derivates raises questions regarding their toxicity. We will demonstrate an analysis of the toxicity of two forms of graphene using four various biological models: zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryo, duckweed (Lemna minor), human HS-5 cells and bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus). The toxicity of pristine graphene (PG) and graphene oxide (GO) was tested at concentrations of 5, 10, 20, 50 and 100 mu g/mL. Higher toxicity was noted after administration of high doses of PG and GO in all tested biological models. Hydrophilic GO shows greater toxicity to biological models living in the entire volume of the culture medium (zebrafish, duckweed, S. aureus). PG showed the highest toxicity to adherent cells growing on the bottom of the culture plates-human HS-5 cells. The differences in toxicity between the tested graphene materials result from their physicochemical properties and the model used. Dose-dependent toxicity has been demonstrated with both forms of graphene.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据