4.6 Article

Eco-Friendly Ferrimagnetic-Humic Acid Nanocomposites as Superior Magnetic Adsorbents

期刊

MATERIALS
卷 14, 期 18, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma14185125

关键词

ferrimagnetic nanoparticle; heavy metal; magnetic; adsorption

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52002266]
  2. Postdoctoral Research Foundation of China [2020M673384]
  3. Shanxi Province Science Foundation for Youths [201801D221142]
  4. Shanxi Applied Basic Research Project [201801D121257]
  5. Scientific and Technological Innovation Programs of Higher Education Institutions in Shanxi [2019L0786]
  6. College Students' Innovation Program of Taiyuan Normal University [CXCY2139]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study developed ferrimagnetic-humic acid nanocomposites as superior magnetic adsorbents for heavy metals, with nanoparticles prepared by coprecipitation method showing more uniform morphology and higher sorption capacity for cadmium. Magnetic technology can be utilized for the recycling of the ferrimagnetic-humic acid adsorbents.
Recyclable, cheap, eco-friendly, and efficient adsorbent materials are very important for the removal of pollution. In this work, we report the design and implementation of ferrimagnetic-humic acid nanocomposites as superior magnetic adsorbent for heavy metals. Ferrimagnetic and ferrimagnetic-humic acid nanocomposite particles with different morphologies were prepared using the coprecipitation method and hydrothermal synthesis method, respectively. The results show that the morphology of the nanoparticles prepared by the coprecipitation method is more uniform and the size is smaller than that by the hydrothermal synthesis method. Adsorption experiments show that the ferrimagnetic-humic acid nanoparticles prepared by the coprecipitation method has high sorption capacity for cadmium, and the maximum adsorption capacity is about 763 mu g/g. At the same time, magnetic technology can be used to realize the recycling of ferrimagnetic-humic acid adsorbents.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据