4.6 Article

Diagnostics of Large Non-Conductive Anti-Corrosion Coatings on Steel Structures by Means of Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy

期刊

MATERIALS
卷 14, 期 14, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma14143959

关键词

steel structures; anti-corrosion coatings; diagnostics; NDT; electrochemical impedance spectroscopy; EIS

资金

  1. Silesian University of Technology (Poland) [03/020/RGH_19/0073, BK-281/RB-2/2021 (03/020/BK_21/0103), BK-264/RE2/2021]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a testing methodology for barrier properties of large non-conductive anti-corrosion coatings on steel structures, using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) along with electromagnetic measurements. The method involves time-consuming impedance measurements and quick electromagnetic measurements to determine coating thickness, and then identifying barrier properties based on correlations between impedance modulus and coating thickness.
This paper proposes a testing methodology for barrier properties of large non-conductive anti-corrosion coatings on steel structures. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was adapted to in situ testing of steel structures by using a prototypical flexible measuring probe and a gel electrolyte that filled the probe, to take measurements on any surface regardless of its position. The first stage of the testing methodology was to perform time-consuming impedance measurements and quick electromagnetic measurements of coating thickness at selected test points. The results were used to determine correlation relationships between the logarithm of the impedance modulus for the coating at a measuring frequency of 0.1 Hz measured with the EIS method and the average thickness of the coating measured with an electromagnetic thickness gauge. Quick electromagnetic measurements were performed in the second stage to specify thickness of the other surface of the steel structure coating. The barrier properties of this coating were identified on the basis of the determined correlation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据