4.6 Article

Monitoring Electrical Biasing of Pb(Zr0.2Ti0.8)O3 Ferroelectric Thin Films In Situ by DPC-STEM Imaging

期刊

MATERIALS
卷 14, 期 16, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma14164749

关键词

in situ TEM; differential phase contrast; ferroelectric; thin film capacitor; PZT; electrical biasing

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [175926, 200021-188414]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Increased data storage densities are needed for the next generation of nonvolatile random access memories and data storage devices based on ferroelectric materials, but these devices may face a loss of their ferroelectric properties with intensified miniaturization. Therefore, understanding the impact of nanoscale defects on ferroelectric switching dynamics is crucial.
Increased data storage densities are required for the next generation of nonvolatile random access memories and data storage devices based on ferroelectric materials. Yet, with intensified miniaturization, these devices face a loss of their ferroelectric properties. Therefore, a full microscopic understanding of the impact of the nanoscale defects on the ferroelectric switching dynamics is crucial. However, collecting real-time data at the atomic and nanoscale remains very challenging. In this work, we explore the ferroelectric response of a Pb(Zr0.2Ti0.8)O-3 thin film ferroelectric capacitor to electrical biasing in situ in the transmission electron microscope. Using a combination of high-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM) and differential phase contrast (DPC)-STEM imaging we unveil the structural and polarization state of the ferroelectric thin film, integrated into a capacitor architecture, before and during biasing. Thus, we can correlate real-time changes in the DPC signal with the presence of misfit dislocations and ferroelastic domains. A reduction in the domain wall velocity of 24% is measured in defective regions of the film when compared to predominantly defect-free regions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据