4.6 Article

Synthesis, Spectroscopic, and Theoretical Study of Copper and Cobalt Complexes with Dacarbazine

期刊

MATERIALS
卷 14, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma14123274

关键词

dacarbazine; triazene; anticancer properties; 3d metal complexes; spectroscopy (IR; Raman); NMR

资金

  1. funds for Science, Ministry of Science and Higher Education of Poland
  2. Bialystok University of Technology [WZ/WB-IIS/5/2020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The spectroscopic and structural properties of cobalt and copper complexes with dacarbazine were studied, discussing the impact of metals on charge distribution of the ligand and evaluating the reactivity of the complexes. Aromaticity of the imidazole ring and thermal stability of the complexes were also compared, along with the analysis of their thermal decomposition products.
Dacarbazine (DAC) 5-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazenyl)imidazole-4-carboxamide is an imidazole-carboxamide derivative that is structurally related to purines. DAC belongs to the triazene compounds, which are a group of alkylating agents with antitumor and mutagenic properties. DAC is a non-cell cycle specific drug, active in all phases of the cellular cycle. In the frame of this work the 3d metal complexes (cobalt and copper) with dacarbazine were synthesized. Their spectroscopic properties by the use of FT-IR, FT-Raman, and (HNMR)-H-1 were studied. The structures of dacarbazine and its complexes with copper(II) and cobalt(II) were calculated using DFT methods. The effect of metals on the electronic charge distribution of dacarbazine was discussed on the basis of calculated NBO atomic charges. The reactivity of metal complexes in relation to ligand alone was estimated on the basis of calculated energy of HOMO and LUMO orbitals. The aromaticity of the imidazole ring in dacarbazine and the complexes were compared (on the basis of calculated geometric indices of aromaticity). Thermal stability of the investigated 3d-metal complexes with dacarbazine and the products of their thermal decomposition were analyzed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据