4.2 Article

Language Experience and Subjective Word Familiarity on the Multimodal Perception of Non-Native Speakers' Vowels

期刊

LANGUAGE AND SPEECH
卷 65, 期 1, 页码 173-192

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0023830921998723

关键词

Speech perception; second language acquisition; audiovisual speech perception; vowels; lexical familiarity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that both native and non-native speakers perform better in audiovisual and auditory-only conditions for French vowel perception, with differing confusion patterns across modalities. The weaker sensitivity to visual information among non-native speakers contributes to the lack of audiovisual benefit. Additionally, there was a significant relationship between subjective word familiarity and perception of non-native contrasts in audiovisual and auditory-only conditions.
The present study investigated native (L1) and non-native (L2) speakers' perception of the French vowels /(superset of) over tilde, (a) over tilde, (epsilon) over tilde, o/. Thirty-four American-English learners of French and 33 native speakers of Parisian French were asked to identify 60 monosyllabic words produced by a native speaker in three modalities of presentation: auditory-only (A-only); audiovisual (AV); and visual-only (V-only). The L2 participants also completed a vocabulary knowledge test of the words presented in the perception experiment that aimed to explore whether subjective word familiarity affected speech perception. Results showed that overall performance was better in the AV and A-only conditions for the two groups with the pattern of confusion differing across modalities. The lack of audiovisual benefit was not due to the vowel contrasts being not visually salient enough, as shown by the native group's performance in the V-only modality, but to the L2 group's weaker sensitivity to visual information. Additionally, a significant relationship was found between subjective word familiarity and AV and A-only (but not V-only) perception of non-native contrasts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据