4.6 Article

GNINA 1.0: molecular docking with deep learning

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMINFORMATICS
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13321-021-00522-2

关键词

Molecular docking; Deep learning; Structure-based drug design

资金

  1. National Institute of General Medical Sciences [R01GM108340]
  2. University of Pittsburgh Center for Research Computing
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) National Productivity Investment Fund (NPIF) [BB/S50760X/1]
  4. Evotec (UK) via the Interdisciplinary Biosciences DTP at the University of Oxford [BB/MO11224/1]
  5. Google Summer of Code 2019 program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Molecular docking software Gnina 1.0, utilizing convolutional neural networks as scoring functions, outperforms AutoDock Vina in redocking and cross-docking tasks when binding pockets are explicitly defined. The ensemble of CNNs shows good generalization to unseen proteins and ligands, producing scores that correlate well with known binding poses. The 1.0 version of GNINA is available under an open source license for use as a molecular docking tool.
Molecular docking computationally predicts the conformation of a small molecule when binding to a receptor. Scoring functions are a vital piece of any molecular docking pipeline as they determine the fitness of sampled poses. Here we describe and evaluate the 1.0 release of the Gnina docking software, which utilizes an ensemble of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) as a scoring function. We also explore an array of parameter values for Gnina 1.0 to optimize docking performance and computational cost. Docking performance, as evaluated by the percentage of targets where the top pose is better than 2 angstrom root mean square deviation (Top1), is compared to AutoDock Vina scoring when utilizing explicitly defined binding pockets or whole protein docking. GNINA, utilizing a CNN scoring function to rescore the output poses, outperforms AutoDock Vina scoring on redocking and cross-docking tasks when the binding pocket is defined (Top1 increases from 58% to 73% and from 27% to 37%, respectively) and when the whole protein defines the binding pocket (Top1 increases from 31% to 38% and from 12% to 16%, respectively). The derived ensemble of CNNs generalizes to unseen proteins and ligands and produces scores that correlate well with the root mean square deviation to the known binding pose. We provide the 1.0 version of GNINA under an open source license for use as a molecular docking tool at https://github.com/gnina/gnina.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据