Savings in per-passenger CO2 emissions using rail rather than air travel in the northeastern US

Individuals and institutions seeking to reduce travel-related carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions by changing travel modes need information on the amount of CO2 that can be saved by rail travel rather than air travel. This study uses flight emissions data from the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) to estimate average per-passenger CO2 emissions saved by using rail travel between selected city pairs in the northeastern U.S. Trend lines are developed from the ICAO data for different aircraft types to facilitate comparison with CO2 emissions from rail travel. Separate rail emission factors are calculated for portions of Amtrak's system operating electric and diesel locomotives. An adjustment factor is estimated to account for longer rail distances than flight distances. Results show rail travel has generally lower CO2 emissions than air travel, with substantially lower emissions for electrified segments of the Amtrak system. At flight distances of over 700 miles, air travel using single-aisle jets can have lower per-passenger CO2 emissions compared to diesel-powered rail travel, accounting for the longer distances by rail. Implications: Savings in per-passenger CO2 emissions using rail rather than air travel in the northeastern U.S. Travel by rail in the northeastern U.S. results in lower CO2 emissions compared to travel by air between the same city pairs using existing airline and passenger rail infrastructure. Savings are higher for cities connected by electrified rail.

Automated summary

This study compared the CO2 emissions per passenger between rail and air travel in the northeastern U.S., finding that rail travel generally has lower emissions, especially in electrified segments. For flight distances over 700 miles, single-aisle jets may have lower per-passenger CO2 emissions compared to diesel-powered rail travel.