4.6 Article

GDCSeg-Net: general optic disc and cup segmentation network for multi-device fundus images

期刊

BIOMEDICAL OPTICS EXPRESS
卷 12, 期 10, 页码 6529-6544

出版社

OPTICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1364/BOE.434841

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFA0701700]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61622114, 61972187, 62001196, U20A20170]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province [2020J02024]
  4. Science and Technology Planning Project of Fuzhou [2020-RC-186]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a general OD and OC segmentation network based on deep learning, adopting a mixed training strategy with different datasets and effectively overcoming the problems of domain shift and inadequate training through newly designed modules. Experimental results demonstrate the competitiveness of this network on multiple fundus image datasets.
Accurate segmentation of optic disc (OD) and optic cup (OC) in fundus images is crucial for the analysis of many retinal diseases, such as the screening and diagnosis of glaucoma and atrophy segmentation. Due to domain shift between different datasets caused by different acquisition devices and modes and inadequate training caused by small sample dataset, the existing deep-learning-based OD and OC segmentation networks have poor generalization ability for different fundus image datasets. In this paper, adopting the mixed training strategy based on different datasets for the first time, we propose an encoder-decoder based general OD and OC segmentation network (named as GDCSeg-Net) with the newly designed multi-scale weight-shared attention (MSA) module and densely connected depthwise separable convolution (DSC) module, to effectively overcome these two problems. Experimental results show that our proposed GDCSeg-Net is competitive with other state-of-the-art methods on five different public fundus image datasets, including REFUGE, MESSIDOR, RIM-ONE-R3, Drishti-GS and IDRiD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据