4.4 Article

High-flow nasal cannula therapy: A multicentred survey of the practices among physicians and respiratory therapists in Singapore

期刊

AUSTRALIAN CRITICAL CARE
卷 35, 期 5, 页码 520-526

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.aucc.2021.08.001

关键词

Survey; High-flow nasal cannula; Respiratory failure; Weaning; High-flow nasal cannula failure

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examined the clinical practices of physicians and respiratory therapists in the use of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC). The results of the survey showed variations in the indications and thresholds for HFNC initiation among different intensive care units.
Background: Use of high -flow nasal cannula (HFNC) has become a regular intervention in the intensive care units especially in patients coming in with hypoxaemic respiratory failure. Clinical practices may differ from published literature. Objectives: The objective of this study was to determine the clinical practices of physicians and respiratory therapists (RTs) on the use of HFNC. Methods: A retrospective observational study looking at medical records on HFNC usage from January 2015 to September 2017 was performed and was followed by a series of questions related to HFNC practices. The survey involved physicians and RTs in intensive care units from multiple centres in Singapore from January to April 2018. Indications and thresholds for HFNC usage with titration and weaning practices were compared with the retrospective observational study data. Results: One hundred twenty-three recipients (69.9%) responded to the survey and reported post-extubation (87.8%), pneumonia in nonimmunocompromised (65.9%), and pneumonia in immunocompromised (61.8%) patients as the top three indications for HFNC. Of all, 39.8% of respondents wanted to use HFNC for palliative intent. Similar practices were observed in the retrospective study with the large cohort of 63% patients (483 of the total 768 patients) where HFNC was used for acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure and 274 (35.7%) patients to facilitate extubation. The survey suggested that respondents would initiate HFNC at a lower fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO(2)), higher partial pressure of oxygen to FiO(2) ratio, and higher oxygen saturation to FiO(2) ratio for nonpneumonia patients than patients with pneumonia. RTs were less likely to start HFNC for patients suffering from pneumonia and interstitial lung disease than physicians. RTs also preferred adjustment of FiO(2) to improve oxygen saturations and noninvasive ventilation for rescue. Conclusions: Among the different intensive care units surveyed, the indications and thresholds for the initiation of HFNC differed in the clinical practices of physicians and RTs. (C) 2021 Australian College of Critical Care Nurses Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据