4.8 Article

Perovskite Solar Cells with Front Surface Gradient

期刊

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 11, 期 28, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.202101080

关键词

open-circuit voltage; perovskite solar cells; quantum dots; recombination; surface gradient

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61804102]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20180835]
  3. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated carrier distribution in halide perovskite solar cells and successfully achieved a gradient structure using perovskite quantum dots, effectively reducing surface recombination without compromising photocurrent. The performance of normal structured hybrid PSCs and MAPbI(3) cells was found to be good, with open-circuit voltages exceeding their respective Shockley-Queisser limits and power conversion efficiencies reaching up to 22.36% and 20.53%, respectively.
The recombination flux in a solar cell is determined by not only recombination centers, but also the spatial distribution of minority carriers. For halide perovskite solar cells (PSCs), although there has been a tremendous amount of work focusing on defect passivation, the issue of carrier distribution is not as well studied as for other types of solar cells. Here in this work, with the incorporation of perovskite quantum dots, the concept of the front surface gradient in PSCs using a solution process is successfully realized. Evidenced by multiple characterization techniques, the minority carriers are pushed away from the defect-rich surface by the gradient of valence band maximum, which effectively reduces surface recombination without compromising photocurrent. As a result, the normal structured hybrid PSCs and MAPbI(3) cells exhibit open-circuit voltages exceeding 93% and 90% of their respective Shockley-Queisser limits, and the power conversion efficiencies reach 22.36% and 20.53%, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据