4.4 Article

A nonstandard finite difference scheme for the modeling and nonidentical synchronization of a novel fractional chaotic system

期刊

ADVANCES IN DIFFERENCE EQUATIONS
卷 2021, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1186/s13662-021-03454-1

关键词

Fractional calculus; Chaos; Nonstandard finite difference scheme; Nonidentical synchronization; Active control

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper introduces and analyzes a novel fractional chaotic system with quadratic and cubic nonlinearities. Numerical simulations determine the lowest order at which the system remains chaotic, and the system's chaotic behavior is studied using a nonstandard finite difference scheme. Additionally, nonidentical synchronization between the model and fractional Volta equations is achieved through an active control strategy, confirming its effectiveness through simulations.
The aim of this paper is to introduce and analyze a novel fractional chaotic system including quadratic and cubic nonlinearities. We take into account the Caputo derivative for the fractional model and study the stability of the equilibrium points by the fractional Routh-Hurwitz criteria. We also utilize an efficient nonstandard finite difference (NSFD) scheme to implement the new model and investigate its chaotic behavior in both time-domain and phase-plane. According to the obtained results, we find that the new model portrays both chaotic and nonchaotic behaviors for different values of the fractional order, so that the lowest order in which the system remains chaotic is found via the numerical simulations. Afterward, a nonidentical synchronization is applied between the presented model and the fractional Volta equations using an active control technique. The numerical simulations of the master, the slave, and the error dynamics using the NSFD scheme are plotted showing that the synchronization is achieved properly, an outcome which confirms the effectiveness of the proposed active control strategy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据