4.8 Article

Phospholipids of APOE lipoproteins activate microglia in an isoform-specific manner in preclinical models of Alzheimer's disease

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-23762-0

关键词

-

资金

  1. National institute of Health [AG056371, AG057565, AG066198, NS116450, NS094396]
  2. Alzheimer's Association [2018-AARG-590509, AARF-16-443213]
  3. ADRC Pittsburgh [P30AG066468]
  4. University of Kentucky [P30 AG028383]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrates that different isoforms of the APOE lipoproteins activate microglia in pre-clinical mouse models of Alzheimer's disease, affecting their response to A beta.
APOE and Trem2 are major genetic risk factors for Alzheimer's disease (AD), but how they affect microglia response to A beta remains unclear. Here we report an APOE isoform-specific phospholipid signature with correlation between human APOE epsilon 3/3 and APOE epsilon 4/4 AD brain and lipoproteins from astrocyte conditioned media of APOE3 and APOE4 mice. Using preclinical AD mouse models, we show that APOE3 lipoproteins, unlike APOE4, induce faster microglial migration towards injected A beta, facilitate A beta uptake, and ameliorate A beta effects on cognition. Bulk and single-cell RNA-seq demonstrate that, compared to APOE4, cortical infusion of APOE3 lipoproteins upregulates a higher proportion of genes linked to an activated microglia response, and this trend is augmented by TREM2 deficiency. In vitro, lack of TREM2 decreases A beta uptake by APOE4-treated microglia only, suggesting TREM2-APOE interaction. Our study elucidates phenotypic and transcriptional differences in microglial response to A beta mediated by APOE3 or APOE4 lipoproteins in preclinical models of AD. Microglia can clear amyloid plaques in Alzheimer's disease. Here, the authors show that specific isoforms of the phospholipid forming APOE lipoproteins activate microglia in pre-clinical mouse models of Alzheimer's disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据