4.8 Article

Non-invasive hydrodynamic imaging in plant roots at cellular resolution

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-24913-z

关键词

-

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/K010212/1, BB/T001437/1, BB/V003534/1, BB/L027739/1, BB/N023927/1]
  2. Leverhulme Trust [RPG-2016-409]
  3. ERA-NET Coordinating Action in Plant Sciences program [ERACAPS13.089]
  4. Belgian Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique (F.R.S.-FNRS) [1208619F]
  5. EU's Seventh Framework Program [FP7-609398]
  6. Junta de Extremadura Spain [GR18168]
  7. Royal Academy of Engineering/EPSRC Postdoctoral Fellowship [EP/G058121/1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study used Raman microspectroscopy and hydrodynamic modeling to successfully monitor water dynamics in plant root tissues at high temporal and spatial resolutions. The results revealed faster water transport in xylem vessels of Arabidopsis thaliana mutant roots with endodermal diffusion barrier mutations, and showed that water transported via the root xylem does not re-enter outer root tissues or the surrounding soil if endodermal diffusion barriers are intact, thus separating 'two water worlds'.
A key impediment to studying water-related mechanisms in plants is the inability to non-invasively image water fluxes in cells at high temporal and spatial resolution. Here, we report that Raman microspectroscopy, complemented by hydrodynamic modelling, can achieve this goal - monitoring hydrodynamics within living root tissues at cell- and sub-second-scale resolutions. Raman imaging of water-transporting xylem vessels in Arabidopsis thaliana mutant roots reveals faster xylem water transport in endodermal diffusion barrier mutants. Furthermore, transverse line scans across the root suggest water transported via the root xylem does not re-enter outer root tissues nor the surrounding soil when en-route to shoot tissues if endodermal diffusion barriers are intact, thereby separating 'two water worlds'.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据