4.8 Article

Water friction in nanofluidic channels made from two-dimensional crystals

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-23325-3

关键词

-

资金

  1. EPSRC [EP/S017593/1, EP/R013063/1]
  2. Royal Society University Research Fellowship [RGF\EA\181000]
  3. European Union [852674 - AngstroCAP]
  4. Ramsay Memorial Fellowship
  5. Royal Society research grant [RGS\R2\202036]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrates that strong hydrophobicity does not necessarily exclude enhanced stickiness and friction, as shown with conduits made from graphite and hexagonal boron nitride.
Membrane-based applications such as osmotic power generation, desalination and molecular separation would benefit from decreasing water friction in nanoscale channels. However, mechanisms that allow fast water flows are not fully understood yet. Here we report angstrom-scale capillaries made from atomically flat crystals and study the effect of confining walls' material on water friction. A massive difference is observed between channels made from isostructural graphite and hexagonal boron nitride, which is attributed to different electrostatic and chemical interactions at the solid-liquid interface. Using precision microgravimetry and ion streaming measurements, we evaluate the slip length, a measure of water friction, and investigate its possible links with electrical conductivity, wettability, surface charge and polarity of the confining walls. We also show that water friction can be controlled using hybrid capillaries with different slip lengths at opposing walls. The reported advances extend nanofluidics' toolkit for designing smart membranes and mimicking manifold machinery of biological channels. Flow through nanometer scale channels facilitates an unmasked study of water-surface molecular interactions. Here, Keerthi et al. show with conduits made from graphite and hexagonal boron nitride that strong hydrophobicity does not rule out enhanced stickiness and friction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据