4.8 Article

The regulatory light chain mediates inactivation of myosin motors during active shortening of cardiac muscle

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-25601-8

关键词

-

资金

  1. British Heart Foundation (BHF) [FS/16/3/31887]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The authors propose that sequential folding of myosin motors onto the filament backbone may be responsible for shortening-induced de-activation in the heart, which is essential for the efficient function of the heart. The Frank-Starling relation, where increased venous filling triggers a stronger contraction in the next beat, also plays a crucial role in the normal function of heart muscle.
Heart muscle cells are inactivated when they shorten during ejection, accelerating relaxation to facilitate refilling before the next beat. The authors propose that sequential folding of myosin motors onto the filament backbone may be responsible for shortening-induced de-activation in the heart. The normal function of heart muscle depends on its ability to contract more strongly at longer length. Increased venous filling stretches relaxed heart muscle cells, triggering a stronger contraction in the next beat- the Frank-Starling relation. Conversely, heart muscle cells are inactivated when they shorten during ejection, accelerating relaxation to facilitate refilling before the next beat. Although both effects are essential for the efficient function of the heart, the underlying mechanisms were unknown. Using bifunctional fluorescent probes on the regulatory light chain of the myosin motor we show that its N-terminal domain may be captured in the folded OFF state of the myosin dimer at the end of the working-stroke of the actin-attached motor, whilst its C-terminal domain joins the OFF state only after motor detachment from actin. We propose that sequential folding of myosin motors onto the filament backbone may be responsible for shortening-induced de-activation in the heart.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据