4.8 Article

Targeted PI3K/AKT-hyperactivation induces cell death in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-23752-2

关键词

-

资金

  1. German Cancer Aid (Deutsche Krebshilfe, Max Eder Grant)
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) [360372040, SFB 1335/P02]
  3. Elite Network of Bavaria
  4. Krebsliga

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Current therapeutic approaches in CLL focus on suppressing the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway, but research shows that CLL cells are vulnerable to hyperactivation of this pathway, which may be a promising concept for CLL therapy.
Current therapeutic approaches for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) focus on the suppression of oncogenic kinase signaling. Here, we test the hypothesis that targeted hyperactivation of the phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphate/AKT (PI3K/AKT)-signaling pathway may be leveraged to trigger CLL cell death. Though counterintuitive, our data show that genetic hyperactivation of PI3K/AKT-signaling or blocking the activity of the inhibitory phosphatase SH2-containing-inositol-5-phosphatase-1 (SHIP1) induces acute cell death in CLL cells. Our mechanistic studies reveal that increased AKT activity upon inhibition of SHIP1 leads to increased mitochondrial respiration and causes excessive accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), resulting in cell death in CLL with immunogenic features. Our results demonstrate that CLL cells critically depend on mechanisms to fine-tune PI3K/AKT activity, allowing sustained proliferation and survival but avoid ROS-induced cell death and suggest transient SHIP1-inhibition as an unexpectedly promising concept for CLL therapy. Current therapeutic approaches in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) focus on the suppression of PI3K/AKT signaling. Here, the authors show that CLL cells are vulnerable to hyperactivation of the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway and suggest this as a promising concept for CLL therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据