4.8 Article

A single m6A modification in U6 snRNA diversifies exon sequence at the 5' splice site

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-23457-6

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan (MEXT)
  2. Exploratory Research for Advanced Technology (ERATO) from Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) [JPMJER2002]
  3. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [20292782, 18H05272, 16H06279, 18J13582]
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18J13582] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The modification of N-6-methyladenosine on spliceosomal U6 snRNA facilitates efficient recognition of the splice sites through cooperation with U5 snRNA, allowing for variation in the 5' exon sequence and contributing to protein sequence diversity.
N-6-methyladenosine (m(6)A) is a modification that plays pivotal roles in RNA metabolism and function, although its functions in spliceosomal U6 snRNA remain unknown. To elucidate its role, we conduct a large-scale transcriptome analysis of a Schizosaccharomyces pombe strain lacking this modification and found a global change of pre-mRNA splicing. The most significantly impacted introns are enriched for adenosine at the fourth position pairing the m(6)A in U6 snRNA, and exon sequences weakly recognized by U5 snRNA. This suggests cooperative recognition of 5' splice site by U6 and U5 snRNPs, and also a role of m(6)A facilitating efficient recognition of the splice sites weakly interacting with U5 snRNA, indicating that U6 snRNA m(6)A relaxes the 5' exon constraint and allows protein sequence diversity along with explosively increasing number of introns over the course of eukaryotic evolution. Spliceosomal U6 snRNA is modified by m(6)A. Here the authors show that m(6)A modification on U6 snRNA promotes efficient recognition of the splice site through cooperating with U5 snRNA, indicating that U6 snRNA m(6)A allows the 5' exon sequence variation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据