4.8 Article

Structure determination of an amorphous drug through large-scale NMR predictions

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-23208-7

关键词

-

资金

  1. AstraZeneca
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation [200020_178860]
  3. NCCR MARVEL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By combining dynamic nuclear polarization-enhanced solid-state NMR experiments with predicted shifts for MD simulations of large systems, the researchers successfully determined the atomic-level structure of the hydrated amorphous drug AZD5718.
Knowledge of the structure of amorphous solids can direct, for example, the optimization of pharmaceutical formulations, but atomic-level structure determination in amorphous molecular solids has so far not been possible. Solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) is among the most popular methods to characterize amorphous materials, and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations can help describe the structure of disordered materials. However, directly relating MD to NMR experiments in molecular solids has been out of reach until now because of the large size of these simulations. Here, using a machine learning model of chemical shifts, we determine the atomic-level structure of the hydrated amorphous drug AZD5718 by combining dynamic nuclear polarization-enhanced solid-state NMR experiments with predicted chemical shifts for MD simulations of large systems. From these amorphous structures we then identify H-bonding motifs and relate them to local intermolecular complex formation energies. Determining the structure of amorphous solids is important for optimization of pharmaceutical formulations, but direct relation of molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and NMR to achieve this is challenging. Here, the authors use a machine learning model of chemical shifts to solve the atomic-level structure of the hydrated amorphous drug AZD5718 by combining dynamic nuclear polarization-enhanced solid-state NMR with predicted shifts for MD simulations of large systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据