4.8 Article

Suppression of mitochondrial ROS by prohibitin drives glioblastoma progression and therapeutic resistance

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-24108-6

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFA0505602]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81872153, 81872408, 81521064]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Prohibitin regulates mitochondrial ROS production by stabilizing the peroxidase PRDX3, contributing to radiotherapy resistance in glioma stem-like cells.
Low levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) are crucial for maintaining cancer stem cells (CSCs) and their ability to resist therapy, but the ROS regulatory mechanisms in CSCs remains to be explored. Here, we discover that prohibitin (PHB) specifically regulates mitochondrial ROS production in glioma stem-like cells (GSCs) and facilitates GSC radiotherapeutic resistance. We find that PHB is upregulated in GSCs and is associated with malignant gliomas progression and poor prognosis. PHB binds to peroxiredoxin3 (PRDX3), a mitochondrion-specific peroxidase, and stabilizes PRDX3 protein through the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Knockout of PHB dramatically elevates ROS levels, thereby inhibiting GSC self-renewal. Importantly, deletion or pharmacological inhibition of PHB potently slows tumor growth and sensitizes tumors to radiotherapy, thus providing significant survival benefits in GSC-derived orthotopic tumors and glioblastoma patient-derived xenografts. These results reveal a selective role of PHB in mitochondrial ROS regulation in GSCs and suggest that targeting PHB improves radiotherapeutic efficacy in glioblastoma. How ROS levels are regulated in cancer stem cells and their contribution to cancer resistance is currently not clear. Here, the authors show that prohibitin regulates mitochondrial ROS production stabilizing the peroxidase PRDX3 and this accounts for radiotherapy resistance in glioma stem-like cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据