4.8 Article

The epidemiology of Plasmodium vivax among adults in the Democratic Republic of the Congo

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-24216-3

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [F30AI143172, R01TW010870, K24AI13499, R01AI107949, F30MH103925, T32AI070114]
  2. Wellcome Trust [109312/Z/15/Z]
  3. Wellcome Trust [109312/Z/15/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study conducted a prevalence survey of P. vivax infections among adults in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, finding a prevalence rate of 2.97% with relatively flat distribution but higher prevalence in certain regions. The research suggests that the P. vivax strains in the DRC may belong to a separate contemporary clade, distinct from non-human ape strains and ancestral European strains.
Reports of P. vivax infections among Duffy-negative hosts have accumulated throughout sub-Saharan Africa. Despite this growing body of evidence, no nationally representative epidemiological surveys of P. vivax in sub-Saharan Africa have been performed. To overcome this gap in knowledge, we screened over 17,000 adults in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) for P. vivax using samples from the 2013-2014 Demographic Health Survey. Overall, we found a 2.97% (95% CI: 2.28%, 3.65%) prevalence of P. vivax infections across the DRC. Infections were associated with few risk-factors and demonstrated a relatively flat distribution of prevalence across space with focal regions of relatively higher prevalence in the north and northeast. Mitochondrial genomes suggested that DRC P. vivax were distinct from circulating non-human ape strains and an ancestral European P. vivax strain, and instead may be part of a separate contemporary clade. Our findings suggest P. vivax is diffusely spread across the DRC at a low prevalence, which may be associated with long-term carriage of low parasitemia, frequent relapses, or a general pool of infections with limited forward propagation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据