4.4 Review

How specific molecular-targeted agents can make obsolete a 'one size fits all' approach in EGFR-mutated NSCLC treatment (Review)

期刊

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/etm.2021.10584

关键词

non-small cell lung cancer; tyrosine kinase inhibitors; EGFR mutations; target therapies; progression-free survival

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite advancements in lung cancer treatment, high mortality rates persist due to disease aggressiveness and lack of early diagnosis. Personalized treatment approaches and TKIs have shown promise in improving survival for certain patients, but further research is needed to address resistance and increase patient survival. Ongoing clinical trials may lead to changes in therapeutic approaches for EGFR-mutated advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients.
Despite many advances in the latest period, lung cancer remains the cancer with the highest mortality. The latest developments concerning lung cancer treatment have changed the clinical practice by prolonging patient survival; however, unfortunately, there remains a high mortality rate firstly due to disease aggressivity and secondly through lack of early diagnosis and screening programs. Currently, researchers and clinicians are talking about personalized cancer treatment, and a complete diagnostic evaluation should consider, in addition to staging and histology, molecular aberrations, and genetics of the tumor tissue. The development of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has led to an improvement in survival for patients with EGFR mutations, this being the most studied driver mutation in adenocarcinoma; and at the same time an important predictive factor for patient outcome following the treatment with TKIs. Reseach must investigate the different TKI combination strategies in order to overcome resistance and to increase patient survival. Currently, there are ongoing clinical trials that will probably change the therapeutic approach for EGFR-mutated advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据