4.1 Review

Safety of FLT3 inhibitors in patients with acute myeloid leukemia

期刊

EXPERT REVIEW OF HEMATOLOGY
卷 14, 期 9, 页码 851-865

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17474086.2021.1969911

关键词

Acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML); FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3); midostaurin; crenolanib; gilteritinib; quizartinib; sorafenib

向作者/读者索取更多资源

FLT3 inhibitors have shown effective therapeutic strategies for treating FLT3(mut) AML patients, but unique toxicities and drug-drug interactions need to be resolved. Research on their combinations with other drugs and their application in different clinical settings is ongoing.
Introduction: Acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML) is the most frequent type of acute leukemia in adults with an incidence of 4.2 cases per 100,000 inhabitants and poor 5-year survival. Patients with mutations in the FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) gene have poor survival and higher relapse rates compared with wild-type cases. Areas covered: Several FLT3 inhibitors have been proved in FLT3(mut) AML patients, with differences in their pharmacokinetics, kinase inhibitory and adverse events profiles. First-generation multi-kinase inhibitors (midostaurin, sorafenib, lestaurtinib) target multiple proteins, whereassecond-generation inhibitors (crenolanib, quizartinib, gilteritinib) are more specific and potent inhibitors of FLT3, so they are associated with less off-target toxic effects. All of these drugs have primary and acquired mechanisms of resistance, and therefore their combinations with other drugs (checkpoint inhibitors, hypomethylating agents, standard chemotherapy) and its application in different clinical settings are under study. Expert opinion: The recent clinical development of various FLT3 inhibitors for the treatment of FLT3(mut) AML is an effective therapeutic strategy. However, there are unique toxicities and drug-drug interactions that need to be resolved. It is necessary to understand the mechanisms of toxicity in order to recognize and manage them adequately.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据