4.1 Review

CD123-targeted therapy in acute myeloid leukemia

期刊

EXPERT REVIEW OF HEMATOLOGY
卷 14, 期 6, 页码 561-576

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17474086.2021.1935855

关键词

Acute myeloid leukemia; targeted therapy; CD123; monoclonal antibodies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AML, a neoplastic transformation of hematopoietic stem cells, has seen therapeutic progress due to recent advances in genomic classification leading to new drug approvals. CD123 is a promising therapeutic target for improving AML patient outcomes, with ongoing clinical trials evaluating various targeted strategies.
Introduction Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) results from the neoplastic transformation of a hematopoietic stem cell. While therapeutic progress has stagnated for several decades, recent progress in the genomic classification of AML has paved the way for multiple new drug approvals. These long-awaited achievements represent a paradigm shift in the approach to a disease that has largely been managed with conventional chemotherapy since the 1970s. With the evolution of targeted AML therapies, novel agents continue to be developed with the goal to improve efficacy while minimizing toxicity. Monoclonal antibodies targeting AML-specific surface markers have emerged as promising candidates to improve outcomes. CD123, interleukin-3 receptor alpha chain [IL-3 R alpha], is highly expressed in AML, particularly within the AML stem cell compartment. Several CD123-targeted strategies are currently being evaluated in clinical trials. Areas covered The authors herein discuss recent clinical data in CD123-directed therapy in AML. A computerized PubMed search was conducted using key words relevant to the various sections of this article. Relevant abstracts presented at the American Society of Hematology, the European Hematology Association, and the American Society of Clinical Oncology were also reviewed. Expert opinion CD123 represents a suitable therapeutic target that has the potential to improve AML patient outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据