4.5 Article

Celastrol Modulates Multiple Signaling Pathways to Inhibit Proliferation of Pancreatic Cancer via DDIT3 and ATF3 Up-Regulation and RRM2 and MCM4 Down-Regulation

期刊

ONCOTARGETS AND THERAPY
卷 14, 期 -, 页码 3849-3860

出版社

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/OTT.S313933

关键词

celastrol; natural products; pancreatic cancer; RRM2; DDIT3; MCM4

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Celastrol has been shown to inhibit pancreatic cancer cell growth, induce apoptosis, and inhibit PGE2 production. Its cytotoxic effect is mainly mediated through the modulation of specific genes and signaling pathways.
Background: Pancreatic cancer is one of the most serious and lethal human cancers with a snowballing incidence around the world. The natural product celastrol has also been widely documented as a potent anti-inflammatory, anti-angiogenic, and anti-oxidant. Purpose: To elucidate the antitumor effect of celastrol on pancreatic cancer cells and its modulatory role on whole genome expression. Methods: The antitumor activity of celastrol on a panel of pancreatic cancer cells has been evaluated by Sulforhodamine B assay. Caspase 3/7 and histone-associated DNA fragments assays were done for apoptosis measurement. Additionally, prostaglandin (PGE2) inhibition was evaluated. Moreover, a microarray gene expression profiling was carried out to detect possible key players that modulate the antitumor effects of celastrol on cells of pancreatic cancer. Results: Our findings indicated that celastrol suppresses the cellular growth of pancreatic cancer cells, induces apoptosis, and inhibits PGE2 production. Celastrol modulated many signaling genes and its cytotoxic effect was mainly mediated via over-expression of ATF3 and DDIT3, and down-expression of RRM2 and MCM4. Conclusion: The current study aims to be a starting point to generate a hypothesis on the most significant regulatory genes and for a full dissection of the celastrol possible effects on each single gene to prevent the pancreatic cancer growth.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据