4.5 Article

Accurate Prediction of Children's ADHD Severity Using Family Burden Information: A Neural Lasso Approach

期刊

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fncom.2021.674028

关键词

deep learning; lasso; feature selection; interpretability; ADHD

资金

  1. Spanish National Project [RTI2018-101857-B-I00]
  2. Community of Madrid
  3. University Carlos III Madrid

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The deep lasso algorithm, dlasso, is a neural version of the statistical linear lasso algorithm that combines feature selection and automatic parameter optimization, showing superior performance in small sample feature selection. It outperforms the traditional lasso in predictive error and variable selection. With dlasso, it is possible to predict the severity of symptoms in children with ADHD based on scales measuring family burden, family functioning, parental satisfaction, and parental mental health.
The deep lasso algorithm (dlasso) is introduced as a neural version of the statistical linear lasso algorithm that holds benefits from both methodologies: feature selection and automatic optimization of the parameters (including the regularization parameter). This last property makes dlasso particularly attractive for feature selection on small samples. In the two first conducted experiments, it was observed that dlasso is capable of obtaining better performance than its non-neuronal version (traditional lasso), in terms of predictive error and correct variable selection. Once that dlasso performance has been assessed, it is used to determine whether it is possible to predict the severity of symptoms in children with ADHD from four scales that measure family burden, family functioning, parental satisfaction, and parental mental health. Results show that dlasso is able to predict parents' assessment of the severity of their children's inattention from only seven items from the previous scales. These items are related to parents' satisfaction and degree of parental burden.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据