4.2 Article

Developing a Context-Bound Model for Hospital Triage in Disasters and Mass Casualty Incidents in the Health System of Iran

期刊

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/dmp.2020.469

关键词

disasters; hospital; mass casualty incidents; triage

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aimed to develop a context-bound model of hospital triage in disasters and mass casualty incidents in Iran health system, using a sequential mixed method. In the qualitative phase, 27 specialists were interviewed, resulting in finalizing key indices including walking, airway, circulation, and mental status. In the quantitative phase, 21 participants weighted and ranked the indices based on clinical importance, simplicity in implementation, and speed of implementation.
Objective: The aim of this study was to develop a context-bound model of hospital triage in disasters and mass casualty incidents in the health system of Iran. Methods: This study was done using a sequential mixed method. Data were analyzed using Expert Choice software program. Results: In the qualitative phase, 27 specialists were interviewed. Walking and purposeful movement, airway and respiration, circulatory status, and mental indices were included in the finalized model. In the quantitative phase, 21 participants responded to a questionnaire for weighting and ranking the final indices based on 3 competing options, including clinical importance of the index, lack of complexity and simplicity in implementation, and speed of implementation. The index of walking and purposeful movements weighing 0.300 and ranking 1, airway and respiration weighing 0.276 and ranking 2, blood circulatory status weighing 0.245 and ranking 3, and finally mental status weighing 0.179 and ranking 4 were obtained. Conclusions: This is the first attempt to design and develop a new context-bound model of hospital triage in disasters and mass casualties in Iran. The development of new triage models is a dynamic and continuous process, and changes will be applied to them, in case further developments and improvements are required.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据