4.4 Article

Survey on tick distribution and tick-borne pathogens in Daejeon and adjacent areas in South Korea

期刊

TICKS AND TICK-BORNE DISEASES
卷 12, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2021.101711

关键词

Tick distribution; Babesia spp.; Borrelia spp.; Daejeon; Tick-borne pathogen; Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus

资金

  1. Daejeon Metropolitan City Institute of Health and Environment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ticks as principal vectors of zoonotic diseases pose a major public health threat, with this study in South Korea identifying the distribution profile of ticks and tick-borne pathogens, detecting SFTSV, Borrelia spp., and Babesia microti. These findings contribute to the prevention and management of tick-borne zoonoses.
Ticks (Ixodidae, also known as hard ticks) as principal vectors of zoonotic diseases such as severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome (SFTS), Lyme borreliosis, relapsing fever, anaplasmosis, ehrlichiosis, babesiosis, coxiellosis (Q fever), and tularemia pose a major public health threat. This study was conducted to identify the distribution profile of ticks and tick-borne pathogens in Daejeon and the adjacent areas in South Korea, where no such epidemiological study has been conducted. From April to October 2019, 16,765 ticks were collected from three genera and four species: Haemaphysalis longicornis (n = 14,949; 89.2 %), Haemaphysalis flava (n = 987; 5.9 %), Ixodes nipponensis (n = 828; 5.0 %), and Amblyomma testudinarium (n = 1; 0.01 %). Homogenized samples of ticks were screened by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (PCR), real-time PCR, and PCR for the presence of the following tick-borne pathogens: SFTS virus (SFTSV), Borrelia spp., Babesia microti, Coxiella burnetii, Francisella tularensis, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, and Ehrlichia spp. As a result, SFTSV (2 cases), Borrelia spp. (32 cases), and Babesia microti (7 cases) were detected. The findings of this study will contribute to the prevention and management of tick-borne zoonoses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据