4.5 Article

Screening and Selection of One Hundred Flax (Linum usitatissimum) Accessions for Yield Production

期刊

JOURNAL OF NATURAL FIBERS
卷 19, 期 13, 页码 7296-7304

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15440478.2021.1944440

关键词

Flax; seed yield; fiber production; screening; linear regression; cluster analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found a high level of diversity among flax resources and identified effective traits related to flax yield through correlation analysis and multiple linear regression. Cluster analysis categorized the resources into seven clusters and highlighted two potential promising genotypes for fiber and yield production in the first and third clusters.
Flax is cultured for fiber and oil production around the world. The demand for flax is increasing in industries each year. In order to screening and selection of 86 accessions from five subspecies along with 19 unknown accessions, the seeds of the accessions were cultured in a randomized complete block design with three replications. The experiment took two years in Karaj, Iran. ANOVA results showed that the accessions and their interaction with year had significant effects on the measured traits (P < .05 or 0.01). Our results showed a substantial level of diversity among the accessions with respect to the measured traits. Based on correlation analysis, there were positive and significant relationships between seed yield (SY) and number of basal branches (NBB), capsules per main branch (CMB), number of capsules and seeds per plant (CP and NSP). Multiple linear regression analysis indicated that the predicting model explained 99% of flax yield variation in which the CP, NSP, and TSW were effective traits in describing the variation. Cluster analysis categorized the 100 accessions into seven clusters. Our results suggested that accessions '19MODIFIER LETTER PRIME and '35MODIFIER LETTER PRIME from the first and the third clusters could be cultivated as promising genotypes for SY and fiber production, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据